AI Software Studio

One broken thing at a time.

Tell us which kind of broken you're dealing with, and we'll show you exactly how we fix it — the checklist, the price, and where it can go wrong for you specifically.

First, one question

What's actually broken?

Process & Build — this is you if

Sound familiar?

  • Someone re-types the same information into two or three different systems every week
  • You're using spreadsheets to run something that should be software by now
  • An audit or client is about to ask for records your current setup can't produce cleanly
Why scope first

Most software budgets don't die at launch. They die at the spec.

Industry benchmarks (the Standish Group's CHAOS studies, McKinsey and Oxford's project research) put 65–75% of custom software projects over budget or over schedule, with close to one in five failing outright — and poor requirements are the single largest cause. $4,000 USD to lock down the spec before anyone touches code is roughly 5–10% of what a typical build costs: cheap insurance against the other 90%.

How it runs

One deliverable, two ways to use it.

01Scoping Sprint — $4,000 USD

You get a Product Requirements Document, a System Architecture Blueprint, and a Work Breakdown Structure with milestone estimates — the same package a senior technical architect delivers, fixed fee, yours to keep either way.

02Architecture Blueprint

The technical plan, the costed build plan, and the price. You sign off before anyone writes a line of code.

From here, two exits — both legitimate. Take the spec and build it yourself or with any other team (Exit A), or continue straight into the Build Sprint below at the price already locked in (Exit B). Plenty of clients stop at Exit A on purpose.
03Build Sprint — Exit B

Fixed price, locked in at the blueprint — typically $8,000–$25,000 USD depending on scope. Delivered in weeks, tested against real acceptance criteria.

04Managed Retainer — optional, Exit B

Month to month. We keep it running, tuned, and supported.

Read the full process & FAQ →

Not a fit
  • Marketing sites, branding, or graphic design
  • Starting straight to code from a vague brief
  • Staff augmentation — a developer to drip-feed tickets to
Audit & Rescue — this is you if

Sound familiar?

  • You (or a dev you hired) built something in Lovable, Bolt, Replit, or similar, and it worked in the demo
  • Real users, real data, or a security scan just showed you it isn't holding up
  • You don't know if it needs a small fix or a rebuild — and you're tired of guessing
Why the diagnostic exists

You've probably already lived the statistic.

Poor requirements and scope creep are the single largest documented cause of failed software projects — the same failure mode that got you here. The Intro Call and Diagnostic exist so the next decision, fix or rebuild, is based on an actual technical assessment, not another guess.

How it runs

Two calls, in order — never straight to a quote.

$200Intro Call (USD)

A short qualifying call, not the diagnostic itself — confirms there's a real problem worth digging into.

Confirmed there's something real? The full Audit & Rescue Diagnostic runs $1,500–$3,500 USD depending on scope, and ends with a clear fix-or-rebuild recommendation and cost.

Starting from nothing instead of fixing something? See Process & Build — same discipline, different starting point.

Not a fit
  • Native mobile app codebases (iOS/Android) — different failure modes, not our territory
  • Formal security or penetration-testing claims — we flag risk, we don't certify it
  • Anything outside web / AI-builder stacks (Lovable, Bolt, Replit, Base44, similar)